Is it ';freak of nature'; hot where you live?

It's 104 degrees outside my house, and it ain't even Noon yet.Is it ';freak of nature'; hot where you live?
yeah, we're under a heat advisory for at least the rest of the week. And my lawn died:(Is it ';freak of nature'; hot where you live?
Im in the Uk and its not that hot :o(
yes
Yes...pant, pant...you got it worse than me though it's only 92 so far here.
yes and OH SO HUMID!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Wow, I won't complained about the 92 here...104 would kill me!
i live in florida...


THE HUMIDITY IS MAKING ME WANT TO MOoOoOoOVE!!!!!!!!
Don't say ain't your mother will faint!!


No, we had a cold front in New Hampshire last night,,,,it's going to be 80 gorgeous degrees out today with no humidity...I feel your pain however.....
101 and humid.Yuck.
Preaching to the choir ....
Not in Western Oregon. Lately, it has been overcast and in the mid to upper 70's. Even an irritated gopher would like it out here. We seldom have extreme weather, except when an occasional huricane collides with a tornado(kidding, of course).
Almost. About 88 degrees and counting!
It was yesterday, but today is a bit better. Tomorrow will only be 70. Yay! And I like hot weather, but I've had it with this.
Yup yup but luckily its going to rain soon :)
nope, it is cloudy and a bit chilly...bah !
97 here : (





not noon yet either.
Yes and it VERY HUMID
well, we are in the middle of a heat wave so it 104 should be our high today.....its too hot to even swim....the pools gunna be FUUUULL
Hot enough to fry a gopher...
It's around 55 to 60 degrees in Washington. It'll possibly rain again today! I want my summer weather back!

Ltd

Does God Exist? Where does God live? When is he going to listen to mother nature?

Yes. Everywhere. and why do you think that mother nature is above Him? He created nature, it is she that bends to His hand.Does God Exist? Where does God live? When is he going to listen to mother nature?
LOL.... What's the bumper sticker I saw? My Goddess gave birth to your God. Always listen to your mother!Does God Exist? Where does God live? When is he going to listen to mother nature?
I take your use of ';God'; to mean divinity/spirituality in general. As a divinity, God may or may not be a concrete, human-like entity with physical characteristics.





God might exist. Can't really disprove his existance, although we can't prove it either, but the potential presence of divinity can't be ignored.





If divinity is real, than it could be found everywhere. It's possible that it might manifest itself into discrete, concrete forms, but it would not be barred from any part of the universe. Therefore, divinity is essentially everywhere.





Because it's everywhere, divinity is the exact same thing as mother nature. It would be impossible for God and nature to be opposed to one another, since either one created/controls the other or they both created/control each other. It'd be like your brain and your heart: they're both parts of the same universal whole, connected with and reliant on each other.
God is indeed everywhere and outside time and space.





';Mother nature'; is merely a descriptive set of rules that define certain observable cause and effect relationships, but don't create anything.





Why would he listen to something that can't think or speak?

Will the human race ever live in peace or is it human nature to fight and kill?

War (or lack of peace) does not exist because humans like to fight. The root of war is justice. For most of human life, war existed to take from others what we wanted for ourselves: land, power, opportunity. Survival was dependant on war.


In the present day, war occurs when we decide that intervention is required. When we say; we are not going to take it anymore.





If you choose peace, then you must be willing to let others be wrong. You must be able to pick up the pieces of your life and walk away, no matter what was done to you. That is peace. If you are the kind of person who cannot let someone ';get away with'; hurting you, then you are the obstacle to peace.





War exists because we don't want to lie down. We want to keep what is ours.Will the human race ever live in peace or is it human nature to fight and kill?
It's in the nature of some powerful assholes that believe they will achieve something by killing a bunch of innocent people!Will the human race ever live in peace or is it human nature to fight and kill?
its definatley human nature for all eternity
I'm going to have to say that conflict is human nature. It has been that was since the beginning of time.
With George Bush as president of America, The only placed the world is heading for is for destruction.





Is it any surpise that the rest of the world hates us, with the likes of Bush %26amp; Blair representing 'Us'!!
probaly not unless all the races combine in one race we might have a chance. but i don't want that not that its wrong but i like all cultures and i don't want them to go away even though i'm mixed w/ nicaraguan,costa rican,indian, chinese, and english.
Sadfully I believe that there wont be peace because of most peoples lack to treat others as they would want to be treated .
one day soon
Instinctively we are still animals and fighting is a natural part of animal mentality. Our ideas about religion, and ability to create technology just wakes our fighting bigger and scarier.
The day that our Lord Jesus Christ comes for us. that is the day that humans will be in peace.
Yes they will live in Peace according to Psalms 37:9-11





9 For evildoers themselves will be cut off,


But those hoping in Jehovah are the ones that will possess the earth. 10 And just a little while longer, and the wicked one will be no more;And you will certainly give attention to his place, and he will not be. 11 But the meek ones themselves will possess the earth,And they will indeed find their exquisite delight in the abundance of peace.
The base human instinct is fight or flight. The second is kill or be killed.





With our basic instincts being so violent, I doubt humans will see the year 3000
It is in the nature of human to try to destroy themselves, though they have the ';freewill'; to choose another path, a path that has greater perils. MAN has a tendency to choose the path of lease resistance; which is this case is the ath of WAR.


Small minded men thrive on war; since they, themselves don't have to do any real fighting.


I would like to see the men who start wars, placed in ring, like the ';gladiators of ancient Rome, and battle it out to the end. In the days when the right was the ';victor.';


This would save allot of innocent people from dying on both sides of the battle.
There will be no peace as long as the parasite known as the human race infests the earth.
If there was no Dark, Light would be meaningless. it's just the way things are - Yin-Yang


we, Humans, as any other system in the Universe, are ruled by this principle. you would never remember names like Mandela, Guevara, Jesus Christ if they hadn't lived surrounded by 'Evil' forces.


keep fighting for the Good!
We will all get along... once Jesus returns!





~ Tiger By The Tail
as long as we have instincts that make us fight and kill, we will never live in peace, the only way we can live in peace is when they invent a way to control our thoughts and actions, and it seems like they are gonna raise the price of gas some more also
Unfortunately, humanity is cursed with free will and varying viewpoints. As long as we all have the capacity to think, there will always be conflict.





Depressing, no? :(
once every human on this earth is dead, then there will be peace.
I think it's in our nature to try to eliminate those we perceive as weak...Darwin's theory of evolution
As much as I wish for peace and equality, it is human nature to fight, judge, and kill. I don't think it'll ever change,sad as it is.
yeah there would allways be fighting and killing in earth as long as you have SATAN going around causing problems
AHHH, another dreamer. I dream of the human race living in peace. Unfortunately, people have different opinions, different opinions leads to conflict, conflict leads to hate, etc...... Well actually I think, maybe people should have thier own opinions, they are entitled to it. But I also think, people should respect others opinions and not have conflict and hate. Today I asked questions and I was angry at others opinions, but when I thought about it, its their right to have their own opinion. So, today, I learned to repect other peoples opinions, instead of attacking them verbally. Maybe, some day, we will all learn to do the same. Take care.
No and yes.





We are too selfish and selfcentered to be satisfied and we pretend to be more advanced that wolves but we are not - we kill more than they do and more viciously.
I am not sure if its human nature to fight and kill, but it is human nature to seek power, control and territory.





Fighting and killing are TOOLS used to satisfy the need for power, control, and possession of territory.





And there is much manipulation used by our leaders to justify the use of fighting and killing. As Michael Moore so clearly showed in Fahrenheit 911, the sons and daighters of congress people and senators aren't signing up for the military. If they so believe in the use of force, why is that?
and history says...





fight and kill.





it sucks, but the world is full of evil. we just have to do the best we can and live to try to make the world better in all ways possible.
I've been asking myself this same question for a while now. I wish I could say for sure that we would live in peace one day, but I can't say that with confidence.
Its gonna be nature, as long as theirs scottish people, iraq, and different religions








face it
I have a theory-people, especially men, eat way too much meat and don't have appropriate outlets for their stress. It is perpetuated by all of the violent T.V. and video games. If people ate a more balanced diet and could find ways to deal with stress that is healthy, then they would start to notice all of the beauty in the world, all of the positive reasons to live a peaceful life.
yes. when christ finally comes and takes control of all things. but as lond as there is islam, it will be impossible.
Think that the nature of all animals is fight, defeat others, but that it's an instinct.


The humans are thinking more than 50 years ago, so in a couple of centuries, the human will live in peace

You're born, you live, you die - just like everything else in nature. Why make it more complicated than that?

It is not complicated at all ... we just like to make it that way ... I try to make life real simple .... breathe, eat, work, love my children .... and love my friends .... like you Jenn ....





BTW ... elbow is a little sore ... but much better .. thanks for asking!You're born, you live, you die - just like everything else in nature. Why make it more complicated than that?
You are already complicating it, by asking this very question.


While it seems simple, you still live to fill in the details. And there's no simple way to do that.You're born, you live, you die - just like everything else in nature. Why make it more complicated than that?
Passions and fears makes the ride bumpy my dear. Hope brings the balance we seek. It's not that easy for us. If we had the brain of a lizard things would be different.
First of all.


Asians=Awesome.








Second...You shouldn't.





Life is to be enjoyed,


Why waste the short time you have with it on bull ****?
Because it's boring :/
Because then I get bored
because we are human
cause some people just arent satisfied i guess...
because its not just about living and dying is the real concern. its the experience that makes it exciting

If you lived near this eruption, would you see nature at work?

or the mighty shaft of teh lord?





http://d.yimg.com/a/p/rids/20090319/i/r2鈥?/a>If you lived near this eruption, would you see nature at work?
I'm pretty sure this is the shaft of the lord





http://www.metro.co.uk/weird/article.htm鈥?/a>If you lived near this eruption, would you see nature at work?
the mighty shaft of the lord would be something you'd probably catch off a cigarette lighter before you found it in a volcano.
2009 BCE shaft of teh lord. 2009 CE nature at work.
IF YOU SAW ME FART A BIG LOUD AND SMELLY ONE.. THEN YOUD SEE MORE THAN YOULL EVER REMEMBER!
I imagined gods shaft to be much larger. And a little less black.
Know what? It just got bigger!!

Do you live as close to nature as I do?

A Man Of Content





Hark; the Magpie is caroling his sweet song


As the dawning creeps over field and wood.


Gone the moon who’s crescent floated across


The dark velvet where Orion had once stood.





“ooo-cree-cha-cree-cha-chigga-woo-ja”


Gently sounds the Yellow-bellied Glider.


While slowly and with deliberation the


Blue Tongue Lizard stalks a Huntsman Spider.





Before the sun tips the graceful Blue Gums


I listen to a crescendo of musical sound


As Lorikeets welcome the dawns arrival


And Bats from groves fly homeward bound.





Awakens all nature on this glorious new day


And the Echidna seeks his breakfast of ants.


While the Platypus tumbles the rivers stones


As she paddles her way through aquatic plants.





Cockatoos warm their toes on overhead wires,


Perched as musical notes of a well known score


Waiting for the Kookaburra to laugh them all in,


What more wanders can this new day have in store?





Lucky I am to spy in the dawn a Chubby Gungan,


A brown frog in this place I happily call my home


Where creature's of every kind come to my hand.


I am content as no other man; never again to roam.























Do you live as close to nature as I do?
Nice, And I wish I was in such a content environment, your words, well spoken, offer hope and fulfilment, to anyone that has any understanding of life and nature. please don't stop submitting. you are great and inspiring, at least to me. Do you live as close to nature as I do?
I try to, but I don't have any of the species mentioned in the poem running around my house.


Be content where you are--what a pleasant concept.





What's a Chubby Gungan?
Lovely view of your surroundings.
I'm sorry, I lost interest after the first stanza. It's just not my type of poem... sorry. Just don't like it xD

Ltd

Is Mother nature's name is Helen. Are you be happy to live on Helen earth?

I'm very happy thanx Helen nature.Is Mother nature's name is Helen. Are you be happy to live on Helen earth?
You lucky thing you! ;) Report Abuse
Is Mother nature's name is Helen. Are you be happy to live on Helen earth?
Mythology is kind of cool sometimes but don't take it seriously. Helen is the name of Timmy's mom on South Park. How do you feel living on a Tard'
Im Happey


thanks hellen earth


can you fix the global warming problem so we dont have to :P
For your convenience I have took the privelege of cutting off the cuffs on all your favourite jumpers while you were out for your annual dog walk.
Im just happy to live..
her boyfriend`s name is terry firma, yeah i know....corny.
Mother natures credit Manager is Helen Waite..if your needing credit..go to Helen Waite
three water molecules went to the north pole, santa said ho ho ho

Mother wants to abort dad wants the child, child, by nature wants to live?

is it a reasonable compromise for the mother to carry the child and hand him/her over after the nine mts. like a surrogate? the upside to this is everyone gets what they want in the end, mother puts herself out briefly and the father and child get a chance at a long relationship with each other.





is this reasonable/unreasonable.





(dad agrees to pay for any surgery to help restore your body)Mother wants to abort dad wants the child, child, by nature wants to live?
It's a fair deal. Besides; what's nine months anyways? It's a bit of time that's all. And no, I'm not going to worry about why I didn't want to get pregnant and get all bent out of shape; whether I've been there or not; it makes no sense to me; life always goes on whether or not I'm mad, sad and or glad. So, let's make the best of it. Now I have a question for you. What are we going to do is through the course of time I fall deeply in love with this child I'm carrying for you; what then?Mother wants to abort dad wants the child, child, by nature wants to live?
compromise we shall Report Abuse

Child by nature wants to live eh? How many teenagers have you met? Seriously though Juno was a fantastic movie, and I commend any women who would carry a baby just for the sake of the baby and someone else. However I am also pro choice and believe every case is different, it depends a lot on weather or not the mother and father have plans on staying together (it is drastic on a child to later learn that they were born as a burdon to the mother and things have a way of coming out in the wash like it or not)finacial situations, and last but not least if the mother has a drug problem including drinking it is not fair to the child to be raised in such conditions.
I think it is unreasonable for a man to make a decision that involves a woman's body. You see, he has the choice in the beginning not to create the life with someone who does not want it. If he is that concerned with what happens to his sperm once it enters a woman's body he must make the wise choice not to put his penis in a woman who does not share the same values.





If he does not make a wise choice, once his sperm leaves his body and enters the woman, she has the final say.





While I do not believe in abortion I also do not believe in a man complaining after the fact (after he gets someone pregnant) one way or the other. You must know who you are having sex. A man can exercise self- control and self pleasure while he dates and finds someone with the same values and then marry her and then have sex with her. Then he wouldn't be in this type of situation.
I think it's a reasonable comprimise. I'm a huge believer that both should exercise self control. the man and the woman. but if the only reason for abortion is that she wants her body back and he agrees to pay for it. then it is a resonable suitation. The child is only half the mother and the rest is the father DNA making the child a completely sepreate person from the mother but taking up space in the mother womb. If she really doesn't want to have the child. she should sign all legal rights up to the father.
unreasonable as a natural bond forms between the mother and child in the nine months which is difficult to break just like that.Dad should look for someone totally willing to be a surrogate if he wants only a child without a family-but the bit about paying for the surgery is always welcome!
Nope, not reasonable. It's her choice.


She can give the baby to him, but she still is a mother when she doesn't want to be.





What about men who abandon the woman whom they've impregnated?


Until a man can birth a child, he has no say in whether or not a child is carried.
Yes it is reasonable if they are married.





Marriage has an inbuilt assumption that a child would be born out of wedlock. Let us not talk of those ';exceptional'; cases, where married people do not purposely want to have children.
jwinning %26amp; Laela put forth the only reasonable answers %26amp; compromise to your inquiry. Reread %26amp; comprehend what they are saying. That will be best for the child, who indeed should be the focus here.
no it's not reasonable. it's not the fathers body that will be going through the pregnancy. his lifestyle doesn't have to change, just hers. her body her choice.
the mother needs to stop being selfish and have he child, abortion is cold blooded murder and the father has a say when its his child. this woman needs to learn responsiblility
it's still a woman's choice to be a surrogate or not. taking away choice returns women to the dark ages when men ruled.
I don't think the mother should have to carry the child. This is where an artificial womb would come in handy.
Yes, responsibility is reasonable to the child. A father is not a surrogate when two have sex outside a marriage and a child is conceived.





Edit:


If the mother exihibits hatred for human life she should be held accountable to carry her child for nine months and no, unless she wakes up the father of the child should not marry a woman who would request such a thing.





The action of sex does not involve your body ladies? When two become one during sex because you are sharing your body with person out of wedlock or within marriage and so is the man...that's just your body involved? If a person fails to accept the reality of how life comes about then do not engage in sex until you do.





I totally am against this ';it's my body'; excuse because a child relies on a woman's body to grow, however is an individual, proof being THE MOTHER who wants to abort seems to feel entitled to individuality but not the child that requries a mother's body to birth. What's the point to say ';I have a body'; while at the same time there is no mention of a child who has a body also. Go to a playground and look at the children laughing and playing and then come on here and try to convince society that little girls and boys who grow into adults don't have bodies. Yet you have a body? I agree that a woman has a body and so does a man. People know that already.
Pregnancy puts a huge strain on the body, above and beyond that surgery can put right. It leaches your bones of calcium, changes they way the body functions forever, and has been linked to many future health problems.





Once there's a way to grow a baby outside of the womb from conception to birth, then the guy can have this type of say. Until then, there's such as strain on the woman that he can't force her. The fetus at the point you can abort it does not have wants or even reponses (early on) btw.





I do understand the issue though - at a personal level, I would consider it immoral if the girl doesn't at least discus these options with the guy, but I can't see a way to legally enforce it that wont produce more problems.
A fetus' brain (or even an infant's brain) is not sufficiently developed for a child to understand the concept of ';wanting to live';. Maybe Nature aimed for the child to live by having it live until now, but a child ';by nature'; cannot ';want to live';.





That aside,





';Mothers puts herself out briefly'; - Any woman who has gone through a pregnancy or two or three (etc) will tell you that it is not a matter of ';putting oneself out briefly';. This is, in fact, why most woman would not be willing to act as a surrogate. It is close to impossible for most women to have a child growing within and not to have a whole array of physical and emotional impacts. I'm not going to get into the whole, big, too-much-for-words, thing about the impact a pregnancy, itself, has on a woman. Just because a few women are willing/able to act as surrogates that does not mean all women can/would be willing/able to handle that emotionally.





The surgery remark: Not all pregnancies/deliveries result in bad things happening to a body; but even if they do, offering to pay for surgery to fix it is, again, not having any idea that surgery is a big deal for a lot of people. Some women would rather live with damage than have surgery. Others would rather not have the damage in the first place and never NEED surgery.





Also, it is generally not in the nature of most women to be able to carry a baby to term and then just ';hand him over';.


Go to the ';adoption'; section of answers, and read about some of the heartache that birth mothers have when they ';hand over'; their baby for adoption. They don't just have it for a few days. It can last a lifetime. Not wanting to go through with a pregnancy and even not wanting to have a baby don't mean a woman is capable of going through the pregnancy and handing over a baby she has carried for the whole time.





Women generally don't want to go through a life of heartbreak, and many worry that being adopted will cause problems for their child as well.





Women generally want what is best for the child they have, and what is best isn't necessarily not to have one's own mother. What kind of thing is it for a child to know his mother handed him over to his father - and then disappeared.





Some women believe there are worse things than being aborted early on. Also, some expectant mothers don't believe the baby's father would make a very mature or capable father.





Men need to be ';men'; when it comes to understanding one thing: If you risk an unwanted pregnancy with a woman who doesn't want a pregnancy you're going to risk having to deal with her getting an abortion you don't want her to get.





Before people risk unwanted pregnancies they need to know, for sure, the views of both parties on abortion.





Men need to also realize that a woman who says she wouldn't get an abortion may just change her mind if she's faced with a pregnancy she doesn't want.





In your proposed plan, the only person who gets what he wants is the father. The mother who may believe that every child deserves a mother who wants him and who is able to be a good mother to him doesn't get what she wants. The baby doesn't ';want'; anything. As far as being killed goes, some women believe that stopping a baby from developing early on is more merciful than allowing him to be born to a mother who doesn't want him (and - one way or another - will give him away). (I'm not necessarily defending abortion - only pointing out how some people think.)





Your plan sounds like the plan of a very young boy, who has no idea about the implications/impact of pregnancy on mothers-to-be. No, it is not reasonable.

What is most important in our development, nature or nuture? If we cloned Adolf Hitler and had him live in..?

Greenland under an assumed name in the year 2045, would his clone also be a mass murderer?What is most important in our development, nature or nuture? If we cloned Adolf Hitler and had him live in..?
No, Hitler was shaped by his experiences. Early in life, he was a painter. He even tried to get into a prestigious art school, but was told that he just wasn't good enough for them. Also, he fought in the first world war and saw the senselessness with which foot soldiers were thrown into the meat grinder. Along with other things, these events led to lingering bitterness, which, because of the way he'd been raised to believe, he focused on Jews. If he were raised in a loving, nurturing environment, he would be a completely different person.What is most important in our development, nature or nuture? If we cloned Adolf Hitler and had him live in..?
Definitly not. All people are born with the ability to choose between wrong and right and each child is born innocent. In his new environment, hitler would not be brought up with the same ideas or by the same parents or in the same society that was dangerous and facist and moulded by the defeat after WW1. He would adopt new understandings, new teachings, new parents and upbringing, and since greenland is pretty much war-less, the society would be relativly healthy in moulding him.


I recommend you watch the film: The boys from Brazil; as this film depicts a story based on the idea of cloned hitler children and it is also a very good film.
Hitler wasn't some crazy murder who just wanted to kill Jews. He was an immensely intelligent person who, by means of being oppressed in his own country, lashed out against the people who had their foot on his face. Jewish people were in control of a country that didn't belong to them. It wasn't their fault, and they didn't ask for Germany, they asked for a home, and since Germany had just been beaten in WWI and was a crap hole of a country, the Jews were put there to make it better. But the German people are strong and very deeply rooted in their countries heritage so they didn't appreciate Jewish people coming in and all of a sudden having more rights than the people who built the country in the first place. If it wasn't for the overly harsh terms of the Treaty of Versailles, WWII never would have happened. As far as your question goes, they are both equally important.
Interesting question, without an over bearing and abusive father and an over protective mother, would he have turned out to be the megolomaniac and sexual deviant that he was? I doubt he would've shown the same mental instability that he developed. what's my basis? none, just common sense, but then again, i'm not a neuroscientist or psychiatrist.
Madness is madness. Nurture cannot change mental instability.
They are both important. Cloning doesn't mean anything. Do identical twins have the exact same temperament???

We live our lives in patterns, we find patterns everywhere in nature. so how does chaos theory fit in?

Is there a universal pattern to be found? or is it just a human truth, our minds built to see and form patterns?We live our lives in patterns, we find patterns everywhere in nature. so how does chaos theory fit in?
no chaos, it's just that the pattern is too large for us poor humans to either see it or recognize it or understand the pattern. Does make life interesting tho'.We live our lives in patterns, we find patterns everywhere in nature. so how does chaos theory fit in?
It is called Apophenia.
Great question. The patterns we see are all part of the big game of life. There is much to learn in studying the patterns, and one should never count them out. Perhaps, rather than our minds being built to see and form the patterns, maybe, instead, we just do see them and form them. However, success and happiness depend in every way on measures of conformity. This does not mean that individuality must be sacrificed, instead, that the patterns must be allowed for. There are violent response to violations of the pattens which you describe. Interesting stuff. Very deep and a subject which could occupy a person forever, honestly.





As for chaos, chaos is a nondescriptive term which refers to the presence, really, of evil or callous conconformity.





Here is a theory as relates to universal patterns. Very deep, so please inhale.





Lucifer and 1/3 of the andels fell away from God plotting to overthrow Him. The remaining angels subdue them and the old heaven expodes in a violent rage of God. Simultaneously, God enivisions the world and creatures to replace the fallen angels (including Lucifer). In His mind would have been the committment to those angels who had not tried to destroy Him and the unconquerable committment to the new creation-a new order in which injustice would never happen again. Many supernatural forces at work would have caused the presence even of evil people and of people with out a point or purpose. The union of the fallen angels and the evil people would have been those destined for hell as in the Bible. As for the rest, the struggle of their life would be their test for eternity, which is, really, the struggle for good ideas.





The exposion of the old heaven would correspond directly with the Big Bang of the Big Bang theory of evolution. Only the one force would have been applied to creation by God, the initial destruction of the old order or the old heaven. After this destruction, God's work would have been in restoring order fully, but in a new order.





As for the questions of timing as in the seven day theory of the Bible. Science and research verify that the universe is 4.5 billion years old or so, so the Bible cannot be trusted to be taken literally on this issue, unless one considers that the presence of the Lord Jesus Christ as a supernatural occurance of the Big Bang. Before God was the Lord in two parts, body and spirit. Now the Lord is the Lord in three parts, God the Father, the Lord Jesus Christ, and the Holy Spirit. [Here goes some deep science] But perhaps the references of the old testament to creation as a seven day event are not crazy in light of Einstein's theory of reletivity. If God the Father remained at the center of the Big Bang (or moved relatively slowly in comparison to it), or the center of the expanding universe, the Lord Jesus Christ would have been on earth awaiting birth and order from God the Father. Far from the hurdling earth, by the theory of reletivity, God the Father would have seen the event as a seven day event. However, the Lord Jesus Christ would have understood the human or earthly viewpoint that the the earth (and the universe) are 4.5 billion years old. Man, receiving messages from God the Father through the angels, who answer to God the Father, would have had only the explaination of God the Father of creation.





Very interesting that, of the Trinity of the Bible, God the Father and the Lord Jesus Christ each might exist and have a unique viewpoint.





So, maybe both the theory of creation and of evolution are correct!





Living things do live in patterns, even birds and trees and so forth, so never lose faith in your thoughts. Your thoughts are the formations of success for you. You might think of yourself as building a foundation for success with your thoughts and actions. However, making certain to correctly divide between your thoughts and any meaningless or pointless thoughts which may arise in your day to day endeavors, will determine if you are able to reach or sustain success or how quickly you are able to reach success. Success is a lofty perch which can only be earned through application or hard work, but, if focus wains, failure will follow. Failure is never inevitable, and it is always a growing experience. The only true defeat is in quitting! Just never quit would be the attitude to keep.





As always, the most important thing is to try to find a way to stay focused on success. Success is happiness!





As for the Bible, maybe you could try a reading in Romans. There are many discussions of order in that particular book. Really good stuff.





Thanks for the question and good luck...
that guy with Apophenia....he just blew my mind

Long time ago, before the wind, before the snow, lived the man I know, lived the freak of nature named ______?

A long, long, long, long time ago





Before the wind, before the snow





Lived a man, lived a man I know





Lived a freak of nature named Sir Psycho





Sir Psycho Sexy that is me





Sometimes I find I need to scream





He's a freak of nature





But we love him so





He's a freak of nature





But we let him go





Deep inside the garden of Eden





Standing there with my hard on bleedin'





Theres a devil in my dick and some demons in my semen





Good God no that would be treason





Believe me Eve she gave good reason





Booty looking too good not to be squeezin'





Creamy beaver hotter than a fever





I'm a givin' 'cause she's the reciever





I won't and I don't hang up until I please her





Makin' her feel like an over achiever





I take it away for a minute just to tease her





Then I give it back a little bit deeper





Sir Psycho Sir Psycho yea he's the man that I met 1 time





Sir Psycho Sir Psycho yea he's the man that left me blind





Sir Psycho Sir Psycho





yea he's the man he's the man he's the man





He's a freak of nature





But we love him so





He's a freak of nature





But we let him go





I got stopped by a lady cop





In my automobile





She said get out and spead your legs





And then she tried to cop a feel





That cop she was all dressed in blue





Was she pretty? Boy I'm tellin' you





She stuck my butt with her big black stick





I said ';what's up?'; now ************





Like a ram getting ready to jam the lamb





She whimpered just a little when she felt my hand





On her crotch so very warm





I could feel her getting wet through her uniform





Proppin' her up on the black and white





Unzipped and slipped ';ooo that's tight';





I swatted her like no swat team can





Turned a cherry pie right into jam





Hello young woman that I love





Pretty punk rock mamma that I'm thinking of





Hold me naked if you will





In your arms in your legs in your pussy I'd kill





To be with you, to kiss with you, I do miss youLong time ago, before the wind, before the snow, lived the man I know, lived the freak of nature named ______?
windyLong time ago, before the wind, before the snow, lived the man I know, lived the freak of nature named ______?
nellie the elephant
eureka
you
Sir Psycho
Ego,





it rhymes with ago,


it's a freak

Ltd

Isn't it true that we live on this planet by nature's consent?

Certainly. We thrive because conditions are right for us to do so. When the conditions change then so will our ability to thrive. It is the same for every species that inhabits this planet with us.Isn't it true that we live on this planet by nature's consent?
we live with it not on it , that is to say evolve with. people to often try to seporate themselves from this planet when we are in fact a product of it.Isn't it true that we live on this planet by nature's consent?
Quite a mealy-mouthed philosophical question, coming from you, prstly one. Stand up and TELL people about God, and our living here by HIS CONSENT. GROW SOME CAJONES.
prstlyone,the aswer is NO-false.Man has learned how to fool Mother Nature.In adverse conditions,such as in the Artic were nature might rule,man has found the way of survival.Nature is historic in it's excistance it may rule with it's omnipotence,but man survives by his wit %26amp; wisdom.
no by GODS consent
In some sense of the word I suppose that is correct...


There were several time periods on this earth that


human life could not have existed...
This is a statement posing as a question. The easy answer is no, we as men (and women) have learned to protect against nature. That doesn't mean we don't lose some battles. Nor can we ignore our impact on nature. Global warming is a reality whether we like it or not!
i think so....
Not sure that it's a choice of consent but we are at the mercy of it and rely on it for everything, in fact we are not separate from it at all.
absolutely. no one can deny that. Nature is more powerful than anyone .be it the tsunamis or the cyclones. We are totally helpless in front of them. Nature has given us the consent not only that. it has provided us with all that we need.
No. We live here because God planned it from the beginning. Nature is what He created for us. And He knows every hair that is on your head, who you are, what you do, what you think and it matters to Him. Check it out!





He says there is appointed a time to live and a time to die for each one of us. Nature has nothing to do with it. We control nature...it doesn't control us.

Has anyone ever tried to live in a system completely isolated from the rest of nature (an ';isolated bubble';)?

Biosphere II (it failed).


Spaceflight

Is mankind meant to live in harmony with nature......?

... or are we just kidding ourselves and we are only circumventing and destoying it by our very nature.Is mankind meant to live in harmony with nature......?
Humans is nature buts they thinks they so cool.Is mankind meant to live in harmony with nature......?
Man USED to be in harmony with Nature. The fact is, even though we are still in control, nature, by it's ';nature'; is against us. Yes it will grow, but animals are naturally afraid and hostile to use. (unless trained other wise) Why do yah think weeds grow up for, and poisonous mushrooms ect..


The answering of your question, no... not by a long shot..
If mankind were meant to live in harmony with nature, we wouldn't still be trying to destroy it by eating, caging, and moving animals from their natural environment. We are building, driving, and removing the very things that not only animals, but us as well need to survive on this planet. Yes, we need certain things from nature to survive the weather and live but we have this over blown ego and need to control all things thru power. In doing this, major money is being spent on oil, power, water, %26amp; other, use to be necessities, to keep us controlled and paying for out dated technology that is killing off our earth. Watch Steven Segal's movie, ';On Deadly Ground';, he explains the loss our environment is suffering because certain companies will lose $$$$ and they are not worried about the future of man.
Mankind was never meant to live in harmony with any one or anything, It is man that creates all of the life experiences that are going on around the world today, each and every human being on this planet has chosen a specific life they want to experience as a human being, for most people this concept is hard to accept but it is true, because you can take a million people and each one of them will have a different chosen life experience.
Got put Adam in charge of the earth. He abdicated in favor of Satan. Now, the rest of us have a choice:.....
Each member of the human race is a part of nature.


To not live in harmony with nature is to not live in harmony with ones self.


To harm nature is to harm ones self.


By causing suffer, we ourselves suffer.


We are not separate, but rather one.





May it all be well with you.
I believe we were meant to
The last panda on earth will be killed and eaten by some hungry human.
Yes.Native Americans had the right idea.Then the rest of mankind came along.Humans have a bad habit of being greedy.We were made with the ability to be smarter.Hm.I see who was the smarter one.Nature is ....nature.Man is greedy,destroys.
We are meant to cooperate with nature.
Nature was harmonious until mankind came along.


We are destroying nature, but nature will win in the end.
NO. the only animal on this planet that will cause the ultimate destruction of his home
Of course, we are the stewards of creation, by our intellect.


If we don't soon figure it out;-{ we'll destroy the whole planet.
I really think so, but mankind greed won't allow him to.
yes, but define nature
It may have started that way...we are a species after all, but once we invented the superhighway -forgetaboutit!
No, that is impossible. We can only prolong the inevitable. What we were meant to do is utilize our supplies ideally. With the evergrowing plethora of knowledge we discover as an evolving species we can not help but to use all of what is feasible.
we are animals. We should be living in harmony with nature. We are actually dependant on nature. Instead of showing nature some respect - We are killing it....





The fashion industry is one of those that is most destructive.
Harmony will return after we rid ourselves of lucifer/the devil/evil. Millions of people are praying and binding lucifer/the devil/evil day and night. In the end, we win.





If you want to read and learn God's Word, here is a day by day outline on how to read and study the Bible:





http://kcm.org/studycenter/bible/january鈥?/a>
I believe we are MEANT to live in harmony with nature, but most of us don't.

So do u ever wish u just lived in the woods communing w/nature amoungst the trees?

Yes especially at night the woods are so inviting...So do u ever wish u just lived in the woods communing w/nature amoungst the trees?
dealing with the human race of people and there personality's oh yes i wish that at timesSo do u ever wish u just lived in the woods communing w/nature amoungst the trees?
Yes there would be way less stress and clothing. And I believe people would be alot happier. Especially when you have to work for something it has more value to you then when it is just handed over.
yes I have my 2 room cabin with no electric,no running water , all planned out far away from a road must have 4wheel drive or 4 wheeler to get there .running stream beside it for water.I could stay there all the time if i could talk my family into going with me
yes
i kinda do, this city life is boring :( but on the other hand, those bugs scare me like hell! seriously imagine sleeping and like some random centipede comes up and bites u r something AAAAAAAhhhhhhhh! no, maybe i rather city life after all... O.o
Oh yeah...I Love woods! That would be perfect!





I love Amazons...I love Elfwood of Arda( Lord the the rings) and Lothlorien!





I love love love love Jungles of Silence of Deltora...Where Jasmine lived!





That would be PERFECT!!
Most of the time!! No clocks, no traffic, just existing and revelling in nature and the green!
I live that way now - you can't see neighbors anywhere around my house! I love it!
Yeah that would be cool to become one with nature if only for a couple months, Ya hippie.
That is what camping is for. For here in the house it is warm and there is coffee!!!
Many times over... but the pulls of work and school and other things keep me where I currently am.
yes,sometimes. certain animal are not human friendly and they can be quite deadly. also, what would u do if you needed medical attention. roots and herbs only go so far
oooh...no...no Walden for me!
YES! I hate people! My town was small until these damn developers cut all the trees down and made housing developments everywhere

Places where theres Communities that live natural type lives/close to nature?

Interested in finding out wheres there communities that live close to nature in Europe mainly but also curious world wide, slower paced lives. Eco communities.





Any 1 come across any 1s that look friendly,peaceful,interestingPlaces where theres Communities that live natural type lives/close to nature?
http://uk.search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt=A鈥?/a>





http://uk.search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt=A鈥?/a>





http://uk.search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt=A鈥?/a>

Is it true atheists don't respect or honor their creator or nature nor will die for it but will live for every?

thing? How ironic. Sacrifies nothing but live for everything.Is it true atheists don't respect or honor their creator or nature nor will die for it but will live for every?
';Is it true atheists don't respect or honor their creator or nature';


I love it how fundie will include TWO things.


ONE that I understand and respect and another that doesn't exist as if they are mutually exclusive.





Kid, it's fundie that doesn't respect nature; it's fundie that believes it has dominion over everything; it's fundie that believes the end is nigh; it's fundie that's waiting for Jesus; it's fundie that believes it doesn't matter what happens to PlanetOurs cos they gonna get raptured anyway.





Etc.





Why can't Christians be honest?


Why can鈥檛 they just say:


';I know my beliefs are illogical, but I've been brainwashed into believing these things my entire life.';


OR


';I am too weak to live in this world, without the hope that there is someone watching over me, and I need to believe in an afterlife';.


OR


';I am too scared to even consider the possibility that there is no God, for fear of being punished by him';.


OR


';The thought of hell is so terrifying to me, that I have to believe, and be good';.


~Is it true atheists don't respect or honor their creator or nature nor will die for it but will live for every?
I think you'll find that atheists honor nature and their families more than you do, who put god before everything. Sacrifice your family and whatever else you please to your imaginary god, but stop thinking that it makes you morally superior to do so.
Yes. Absolutely correct, sir.





I am very glad that I am not mentally handicapped enough to die for something that is just a speck of human imagination.
Our ';creator'; is our parents. See, sometimes, when a man and a woman love each other very much, there's so much love it makes a whole new person.





And it's mostly theists who destroy the environment because they think of the one planet we have as disposable.
I respect nature. Are you saying I should die for nature? If you are such a f'in martyr why don't you kill yourself for God right now?
atheists don't believe in God


some atheists do respect the natural world though
How ironic that these fundies sacrifice their minds for nothing.
Seriously, WTF? That doesn't even make sense.


What the hell are you smoking?
You just don't get it, do you...

Ltd

In early times,humans lived in close association with nature.do you think that the situation has changed.?

Absolutely, if it isn't prepackaged, fast and convenient, we as society don't have much to do with it anymore. In early times,humans lived in close association with nature.do you think that the situation has changed.?
yes, we no longer cultivate food like we used to. now when ever we want something it's off to the grocery store, or gas station. human beings today are at the furthest point of association with nature that we have ever been. In early times,humans lived in close association with nature.do you think that the situation has changed.?
No it hasn't really changed. We may think it has because we get our food at a grocery store instead of hunting for it, but we are still at the mercy of nature. Environmental changes may take longer to effect us (us in the developed world), but drought, flooding, global warming, etc will have a big effect on how we live.





Guess it depends on your definition of ';living in close association.'; If you mean proximity to trees then the answer is yes.
I would say not really. Plus the fact that a lot of ppl don't care about throwing garbage around in the forests where I live and stuff. It would be better if we were more associated with nature like before in some areas.
Yes.


The change is agriculture. With agriculture, we are no longer dependent on the natural carrying capacity of the land.

Am a nature and green life lover ,where do you recommend i live i Australia ?am not hot climate fan though?

Tasmania sounds the best place for you, over 40% of the state in national park and world heritage wilderness, it has the coolest aveage climate and green issues have the highest profile and impact in the country (about 20% of our state politicians are Green)Am a nature and green life lover ,where do you recommend i live i Australia ?am not hot climate fan though?
To answer your last point, look at Some parts of Victoria, the very south of NSW and Tasmania. They are all fairly rural to some degree and probably greener than most parts of Oz.





You will detest the Queenland and Northern territory climates (and northern parts of Western Australia), but the very south of WA may also be an option.Am a nature and green life lover ,where do you recommend i live i Australia ?am not hot climate fan though?
Tasmania - it's absolutely gorgeous, chock full of wildlife, scenery, and wilderness. It is very liveable with lovely smaller cities and towns. The weather is warm in summer, and cool to cold in winter. You'd just love it.
Practically any climate you want in Australia.


If it is too hot you live south if too cold you go north.
The Southern Highlands of NSW, is best, Green, Clean and Cool all year around. I live there now and I am not moving
nsw -central coast , really beautiful and dosnt get to hot either .
Tasmania

If you were hairy like Patty Arquette in Human Nature, would you live in the woods?

Beset with a condition like hyperhirsutism, and looked upon as freaky, being away from civilization and living nude in solitude would be a likely solution.If you were hairy like Patty Arquette in Human Nature, would you live in the woods?
Never heard of Patty Arquette....I'm pretty furry though.If you were hairy like Patty Arquette in Human Nature, would you live in the woods?
Aside from the ';bear'; community, there are those who see hyperhirsutism as a complete turnon. Kind of a fur fetish. I personally like furry guys and know there are a lot of fur lovers out there. I wouldn't run away and hide. I'd flaunt it for the world to see!!
I could probably get away with it in the mountain town I live in.











lol





Just a throwback from a tree with no branches...