Why do you suppose nature has made it possible for the smallest living thing to be able to kill the largest?

It's all part of the great cosmic balanceWhy do you suppose nature has made it possible for the smallest living thing to be able to kill the largest?
Because ALL life seeks to manipulate the environment in a way which benefits itself/it's species. Virii don't seek to kill their hosts, (it's bad for them if they are stuck inside a dead piece of meat!) It's just they make assumptions about how it's environment behaves, and sometime those assumptions end up killing the host.





If the smallest things work well with larger things it's called Symbiosis, if doesn't work well it's called illness.Why do you suppose nature has made it possible for the smallest living thing to be able to kill the largest?
All living creatures need defense mechanisms so they are able to survive.





The ones that don't have these mechanisms either a) die out, or b) evolve so they can keep on living.





So the species that are alive today have evolved in such a way that they are able to defend themselves from predators and thus survive.





It's evolution.
Exactly, beside just think about the little literal machine in the flagella, there is no possible way nature and science alone could ever make that. Also with the idea of evolution the creater himself Darwin something, said if there is ever any more complex thing found then it would prove my theory wrong, or at least his words sounded like and meant that. Not only that but some accounts say he gave up on his own idea and became saved. God bless!
Er, because over the course of time the largest evolved from the smallest, and the nucleic acid sequence recognition allows the smallest to take advantage of the RNA of the biggunz.
Because if the smallest living thing couldn't protect itself how would the species survive?
The smallest things work in tremendous quantities..there is it' s power


Look at ants..they work as one organism


(not mentioning bacteria)
The answer is simple. There are ten thousand ways to skin a cat. The smaller you are the more creative you have to be in order to take down the big ones. good example is humans and guns.
why this question would imply that there is a design element involved. now randomness does not have a design element...so how can this be? interesting question...but in all honesty, i have no idea.
Because the largest isn't necessarily the best, and that is not true in all cases.
you mean like a ant take down a elephant?...cant happen...





50000 ants take down a elephant...possible
perhaps to establish a new equilibrium that benefits only the perpetuation of life, not just human life.
Amazing about Divine Design, isn't it!? :)
Why-questions are futile in Biology.
There is no intent or purpose behind it.





That which is able to survive, survives.





Blessings :)
';Mother'; nature is a beaotch
Death is Nature's Way of telling you to chill.
Well a large anaconda goes great with a wet kitty :)
It's the balancing process. There's a fancy word for this but I can't recall at the time.
Irony?





Who say's that irony is not a valid reason?
because big things are made of small things
its nature dude.....we will never know
i don`t know
so we don't fill up with dead bodies
1 Corinthians 1:27


But God chose the foolish things of the world to shame the wise; God chose the weak things of the world to shame the strong.