How could nature select who would live throughout evolution without a plan of what it was trying to achieve?

Natural selection doesn't have and doesn't require a plan, and isn't trying to achieve anything at all. Similarly, a river doesn't need a map or an objective in order to find its way to the sea. Its waters simply go with the flow in accordance with gravity and geographical factors.How could nature select who would live throughout evolution without a plan of what it was trying to achieve?
Natural selection doesn't ';pick'; or ';select'; its attributes, per se. It randomly gives beings random attributes and releases them onto the wild. The one attuned to its surroundings survive and thrive, the others die out. That's what you call natural selection.How could nature select who would live throughout evolution without a plan of what it was trying to achieve?
your question implies that there is a goal to nature. There is no reason, a priori, to assume that such a purpose exists. What evidence do you have that there is an actual plan, an actual goal to reality?
The members of the population that didn't have the adaption needed to survive, didn't survive. Most forms of life that have existed on this world are now extinct.
Survival of the fittest and the ones that could adapt to the changing environment played a big roll.
nature doesnt pick or selet who survives. those who aren't strong enough or smart enough will not survive