Is it better to have a government than live by the laws of nature?

Nope, Look at the American Natives, there were VERY few problems, before the white man and his laws came around...Is it better to have a government than live by the laws of nature?
i think a local small government would be ok. Every neighborhood or county can make up their own laws. abolishing a national government is not a bad idea. without a national government there would be much less war. and it would force people to work together like we should be doing instead of being all selfish and isolated. The homeless problem would go away because there would be a huge need for new people to maintain law and order for each community. If you dont like the laws of one county you can move to another that fits your needs. that way there are communities of people who think the same way. the only bad thing is there would be more conflict between counties over resources. but it would be on a small scale and thats much better than what we are doing now. Good people are funding these ridiculous wars that dont benefit our own community in any way. people in the middle east are just trying to live their life as they see fit. We should do the same I would never go to iraq for any reason it makes no difference who wins or loses.Is it better to have a government than live by the laws of nature?
Fact: EVERYBODY has laws. It worked for the indians because they were undivided and in small tribes, however, under a untied nation, a government is a necessary evil.



Yes, because one of the laws of nature is ';kill or be killed';, and I'd rather not have to worry about that 24-7, thanks.
Only if that government stays out of the way...